When initially hearing arguments in April, justices seemed deeply divided over the decision ahead. Idaho's legislature and Governor enacted the abortion ban after the Supreme Court overturned Roe V.
The court dismisses an abortion case it now says it should never have accepted, opening a window on internal tensions.
The Supreme Court in January agreed to take the case and allowed the law to take effect before hearing arguments ...
Today’s decision — like the one in January — will have an immediate effect, preventing Idaho, as Kagan wrote, “from enforcing its abortion ban when ... that the hearing was ...
As Salon previously reported, justices appeared to be split on whether or not Idaho’s near-total abortion ban overrides EMTALA or not during the hearing, which took place on April 24 ...
The most peaceful car ride I take with my kids is on the way home from the library. They can’t wait to read their selections ...
As expected after the court said it inadvertently uploaded the opinion prematurely on Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ...
Abortion and Reproductive Rights are on the 2024 Election Ballot: Interview with Dr. Kristyn Brandi, an ...
Advocates warn messages, search history, location data and even period trackers can be too easily accessed by police, ...
The Supreme Court in January agreed to take the case and allowed the law to take effect before hearing ... of Idaho’s ban, not only because the law does not specifically mention abortion ...
Since Idaho’s draconian abortion ban took effect, we’ve seen chaos and suffering for ... Republican leaders refused to give ...