Federal appellate judges ruled in favor of NASCAR in an antitrust lawsuit, vacating the injunction that required 23XI and Front Row to be recognized as chartered teams.

XI and FRM are pushing for a full court rehearing after losing a key NASCAR ruling, fighting to keep their charters and challenge the system's fairness ...

The latest development in the antitrust lawsuit brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR came on ...

It’s halfway through the 2025 season, and the antitrust saga between 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports, and NASCAR is still in motion. Recently, there have been new proceedings that involve the U.

“NASCAR knows it has no defense to the monopolization case so they have come up with this claim about joint negotiations, which they agreed to, never objected to, and now suddenly it's an antitrust ...

Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing claim a Fourth Circuit decision would encourage monopolists to avoid antitrust challenges by requiring a litigation release before allowing companies to ...

The Sanctioning Body will also be in court with the teams that did not sue them on Tuesday over fact discovery financial ...

NASCAR antitrust case: Appeals judges show skepticism over injunction. By Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi. May 9, 2025. A three-judge federal appeals court panel expressed skepticism Friday morning ...

Although Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing team and Front Row Motorsports won a preliminary injunction in their antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR last December, it might not stand up to scrutiny on appeal.

NASCAR on Wednesday petitioned U.S. District Judge Kenneth D. Bell to order racing teams that aren’t part of 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports’ antitrust case to provide financial ...

A federal judge's ruling demands 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports disclose financial records, intensifying the NASCAR ...

The case went before a panel of three judges in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday in Richmond, Va. The judges appeared to lean toward NASCAR's argument that the basis of the injunction ...