By Nate Raymond BOSTON, Jan 5 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration cannot carry out steep cuts to federal grant funding provided by the ...

A federal appeals court in Boston heard arguments Tuesday as the Trump administration seeks to overturn a ruling that found the NIH acted unlawfully in terminating research grants.

Overall, the decision is a clear win for research universities, with the threat of these funding cuts seeming increasingly remote. There are plenty of other ways that scientific funding is under ...

The ruling means the NIH will continue to pay indirect cost rates, which fund labs, infrastructure and utilities.

A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a ruling preventing the Trump administration from cutting billions of dollars in support of research payments to universities, medical centers and other ...

A U.S. appeals court has ruled against the Trump administration’s moves to implement drastic cuts to federal grant funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to cover overhead costs ...

Anil Oza is a general assignment reporter at STAT focused on the NIH and health equity. You can reach him on Signal at aniloza.16. Emory is the data editor at STAT. He’s a data journalist with a ...

A US federal appellate court on Monday upheld a district court injunction on funding cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants for medical research. A three-judge panel for the Court of ...

Massachusetts scientists on Tuesday applauded a federal appeals court ruling that the Trump administration lacked the authority to make its earliest drastic cuts in funding for medical and scientific ...