Their response to Clarence Thomas' ethics scandal continues to be silence or scoffing at the idea that Congress should do ...
Thomas issued a statement saying he was not required to disclose the trips ... justices," Murkowski said in a statement. "The Supreme Court must demonstrate independence and fairness as they rule ...
The Supreme Court is heading into the final stretch of its current session, the first with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on the bench. While no single case has elicited the political tension that ...
The world of higher education is watching and waiting for a Supreme Court decision that could impact the role race plays in ...
[MUSIC PLAYING] Today, the justices of the Supreme Court ... rule that judges and justices should avoid the appearance of impropriety. So let’s do them one at a time. We’ve got trips.
Four Supreme Court justices — Clarence Thomas ... a decision about whether or not that legislature should be able to rule over federal elections without any checks or balances or if we still ...
They have called for protesters to be prosecuted under federal law ever since there were larger and angrier demonstrations outside Supreme Court justices ... protection of free speech if applied ...
While tough questions alone are not a clear sign of how the justices might rule, the court's 6-3 conservative ... The question before the Supreme Court is whether the "fair use" doctrine of ...
On April 28, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that enforcing the Department of Labor’s (DOL) tip ...
As the Supreme Court weighs President Joe Biden’s ... legal experts predict. And even if the justices rule in favor of the Biden administration's initiative to provide debt relief to low ...
Unfortunately for borrowers, legal experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court ... rule 6-3 against it, along conventional ideological lines," he said. Schwinn anticipates the six conservative ...
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee spent a hearing Tuesday making the case for legislation that would put the Supreme Court under ... off” justices they think would rule against them.
