Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution ... for the Grants Pass case. That case involves a web of local ordinances that, the ...

A decision in the case is expected by the end of June. Justice Thomas returns to Supreme Court after 1-day absence Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is back on the bench after an unexplained ...

Though Trump is not a party in the case, the appeal indirectly thrust him onto the Supreme Court’s docket for the third time this election year. Special counsel Jack Smith has charged Trump with ...

It is the "sleeper" case that could upend the most closely watched criminal prosecution in the nation. And how the U.S. Supreme Court decides the fate of an obscure Capitol riot defendant will ...

Over at Vox, Ian Millhiser prompts a connection I missed while discussing the oral arguments at the Supreme Court the other day. You may recall that the case under discussion was Fischer v.

suburbs to South Jersey and Delaware, what would you like WHYY News to cover? Let us know! The U.S. Supreme Court will soon hear a case, Johnson v. City of Grants Pass, that could have sweeping ...

Tax cases are suddenly all the rage. The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in another tax case—this one focused on valuations and the federal estate tax. Closely held corporations ...

April 16 (UPI) --On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that could radically change how cities respond to the growing problem of homelessness. It also could significantly worsen the nation ...

The only question now is whether that is enough to persuade at least five justices on the conservative Supreme Court. Much of the case centers around the Supreme Court’s 1982 ruling in Nixon v.

MADISON - The state's highest court is taking up a lawsuit today that could remove powers from the Republican-controlled state Legislature, reshaping state government. Wisconsin Supreme Court ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared divided ... and that Congress intended it to be expansive. "The case as it comes to this court presents a straightforward question of statutory interpretation ...