Prince Harry’s claim that his police protection was 'unfairly' changed was flatly dismissed by a Home Office minister on Wednesday. Asked about the assertion by the Royal’s lawyers in a court battle, police minister Chris Philp told LBC Radio: “I don ...

Prince Harry's attorney argued against the 2020 decision to strip Harry of taxpayer-funded police security when he visits Britain

Prince Harry’s fight for police protection in his birth country is officially underway. The start of his three-day hearing in London kicked off on Thursday and while the red-headed royal was not in attendance, his attorney, Shaheed Fatima, argued against ...

The Home Office said RAVEC had considered the "likely significant public upset" that would stem from something happening to Prince Harry and was aware of the "tragic death" of his mother, Princess Diana, who died in a car accident in 1997 after her vehicle was pursued by paparazzi.

Prince Harry has been subjected to unlawful, unfair and unjustifiable treatment by the British government over the decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, his lawyer told London's High Court on Tuesday.

Prince Harry's lawyers say the impact on Britain of any successful attack on the young royal mean he should get full police protection when he visits.

This case is about the right to safety and security of a person. There could not be a right of greater importance to any of us,” Harry’s barrister Shaheed Fatima said Tuesday.

Prince Harry took his fight with Britain's Home Office over his security to the country's High Court on Tuesday, where he argued he has been treated unfairly and possibly put in danger.