Their response to Clarence Thomas' ethics scandal continues to be silence or scoffing at the idea that Congress should do ...

"These attacks on the Supreme Court and the justices must end," they wrote. "They are undermining the rule of law, endangering the security of the justices and their families, and inflicting ...

Thomas issued a statement saying he was not required to disclose the trips ... justices," Murkowski said in a statement. "The Supreme Court must demonstrate independence and fairness as they rule ...

A ProPublica investigation into undisclosed luxury trips that Justice Clarence ... binding authorities in handling dilemmas. But Supreme Court justices don’t necessarily need to abide by the ...

[MUSIC PLAYING] Today, the justices of the Supreme Court ... rule that judges and justices should avoid the appearance of impropriety. So let’s do them one at a time. We’ve got trips.

They have called for protesters to be prosecuted under federal law ever since there were larger and angrier demonstrations outside Supreme Court justices ... protection of free speech if applied ...

Unfortunately for borrowers, legal experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court ... skeptical that the justices will greenlight the relief. "I expect the court will rule against the Biden ...

Four Supreme Court justices — Clarence Thomas ... a decision about whether or not that legislature should be able to rule over federal elections without any checks or balances or if we still ...

While tough questions alone are not a clear sign of how the justices might rule, the court's 6-3 conservative ... The question before the Supreme Court is whether the "fair use" doctrine of ...

The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Supreme Court ethics reform on Tuesday, as questions continue to swirl about the business dealings of several justices. And it will proceed ...

And yet the supreme ... court separate and free from congressional interference, while sending along a “statement on ethics principles and practices” signed by all of the court’s nine justices.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee spent a hearing Tuesday making the case for legislation that would put the Supreme Court under ... off” justices they think would rule against them.